Why, after 20 years in finance, I support Occupy Wall Street

I have spent my entire 20 year working life in the financial services industry and therefore have little or no idea how, in terms of corruption, the industry compares with any kind of global average. Certainly many corporate sectors appear to have their issues, from admissions of bribery by global industrial giants, environmentally sketchy behaviour in mining and resources and, for most, the participation in de facto influence peddling affecting political legislation.  Nonetheless, it is also true that I have never encountered a single financial services employee at or above the VP level that has not, as a function of their career ascendance, successfully and frequently averted their eyes from blatant client assreaming. As one example, the travesties of the Syndication process still result in retail brokers being handsomely paid to ram the detritus unacceptable to institutions into the private accounts of their largely ignorant (even if they don’t think so) clients. Inexplicably, this continues after a prolonged period of Syndication-related outrage after the tech bubble imploded.

The root cause of greed in capital markets is immediately intelligible. The flows of money through a global investment bank are so incomprehensively vast that the diversion of one hundredth of one percent of it into a bonus pool is easily sufficient to support a small group of people (ie a trade desk) in a life of obscene luxury. The temptation to do so, easily rationalized after years of Ivy League schooling and 70 hour work weeks in an environment that encourages avarice, is most often too much for mortal humans to avoid. I would suggest that most participants in the OWS would also fail this test of character, but that is possibly just a rationalization for the fact that I did as well.

If we accept that all bank executives are well aware of corruption and weigh outsized compensation as, to some extent, a suitable offset, this can lead to the misguided assumption that the hundreds of thousands of financial services employees represent a unified front against any type of new, more punitive, reform measures. But while there are a disproportionate number of narcissists and psychopaths on trading floors and within broker offices,  a good segment of people inside the industry spend a significant amount of time disgusted, both with the actions of the less scrupulous and the bureaucratic structures that encourage them. Who better to know the details on this serial rapistry of the general populace than those who make the accounting entries?  Virtually everyone within the financial services industry I have spoken with – brokers, investment bankers, and in institutional sales – have professed a degree of sympathy with OWS that would likely stun the protestors themselves. We have all seen things we were not proud to be a part of.

To date, the primary criticism of the OWS movement from within financial services has been the lack of specific, coherent reform demands.  This is, of course, completely disingenuous in that the industry has employed its considerable intellectual capital into disguising the means by which they have been steadily fleecing the peasants. Did we really expect that a group of young, pissed off unemployed would demand tighter bid/ask spreads in the portfolios underlying structured products? Would the industry not have panicked if they did? The answer to the latter question is probably not – the political influence necessary to prevent the enactment of legislation enforcing corrective measures remains intact.

The argument that OWS is pointless because they can’t re-design the banking system themselves is a ridiculous attempt at tactical ambiguity and Orwellian dissembling, one assumes directed at buying time until the New York weather turns icy and whole thing goes away.  And to be fair, this remains the most likely outcome barring some type of charismatic leadership that can hone the collected outrage into focused political power sufficient to terrify the heretofore unchallenged hegemony of the K Street bank lobbyists.

The Occupy Wall Street movement is justified on many fronts. An extraordinarily wealthy segment of society, after claiming and accepting the right to operate unfettered after the repeal of Glass Steagal, completely failed to accept the responsibility that this entailed. The fact that a protest movement has not produced a solution to the money/influence construct that has been present since civilization was formed, has little to do with the validity of their cause. And perhaps most importantly, they will find a more sympathetic audience within the banking world than they suppose.

About these ads

8 thoughts on “Why, after 20 years in finance, I support Occupy Wall Street

  1. Charles Bailey says:

    I have read 3 of your posts. Thus far they are A++. Your blog is now a required daily read for me. Keep up the great work!

  2. Shermanator says:

    Wall Street is a casino. If you win you win, and if you lose, you’re given a new stake at the casino across the street. There’s nothing wrong with casino’s, you just can’t let them get so big that they threaten Main Street’s existence. Lehman failed, Wachovia failed, Merrill failed, and Bear failed. The politicians just didn’t have the guts to let Morgan Stanley and Goldman (and GE for that matter) go – after all, who would pay for their re-election campaigns?

    If you’re going to indict bankers, you have to indict the casino’s customers. Home buyers leveraged themselves to the eyeballs in a “can’t lose” property flipping orgy. Bernanke/Greenspan provided the 0% credit line. All Wall St. did(at Barney Frank & Chris Dodd’s urging) was merely lower the table limit so everybody could play.

  3. BCO says:

    I share many of your sentiments.

    But I feel this OWS crew is the wrong horse to back.

    This mob detract from the validity of any message.

    • Interloper says:

      I share these types of misgivings but pretty horses are rare in these instances. When the industry manages to excommunicate even St Paul Volcker, I’m not sure there are a lot of alternatives.

  4. I think it is important to separate the movement from the catalyst to the movement. I could take or leave the diverse group of souls in lower Manhattan, or the dozen kids in front of the CBOT etc. I am generally for unrest in times that need reform. If some of those voices feel the need to cliche themselves with bongo drums — so-be-it. Those individuals are unlikely to make it into a voter’s booth at the correct day/time; let alone help influence legislation or regulation.

    What I do see as valuable (and can ascend to even as a hedge fund-er) is that the current system of crony capitalism is neither healthy for the geese nor the gander. Even if half of OWS isn’t well-read or thoughtful enough to realize it — that’s what their real beef is. It’s not that they think everyone should have a six figure job with dental insurance, it’s that they don’t think the way in which those jobs are rewarded should feel inherently fixed. I’m generally on-board with fairness. I went to state school. I worked and continue to work my tail off for the benefit of our investors. When I look around the industry, I feel a minority when in certain groups. I used to make a joke of it. After surviving the first six years of a “colorful” trading career — I realize it simply isn’t sustainable.

    Enjoying your comments, keep up the good work.

  5. Love it. It’s always awesome to see on the page what you knew but couldn’t elaborate so cleanly.

    How “pretty a horse” does this movement need? Another Teddy Roosevelt?

  6. Octavio Richetta says:

    The OWS movement is the natural outcome of the extreme role the financial industry managed to reach in our society. The OWS is more a symptom than a cure for the disease. Paradoxically, the more to extremes we go, the more certain I am our country will find a fix. We are not there yet by any measure. Just two examples: Bonuses continue to posts records, extreme leverage is alive and well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 202 other followers

%d bloggers like this: