Most Likely to Succeed in Finance: “Unlucky at Love” E-mailers

When no brokers are in the room, management will refer to them as “sales reps” or “the sales force”.  When they are in the room, the same executives will emphasize the entrepreneurial aspects of broker business-building and the fact that they are the “lifeblood” of the company. They will mean it, too, but the mental framework of brokers as higher-knowledge, higher-paid appliance salespeople at Sears dominates their decision making nonetheless.

The denizens of Capital Markets, while recognizing the occasional value of retail-facing brokers, permit themselves a higher degree of scorn for the average broker but, importantly, this is often a defensive reflex designed to emotionally shield themselves from the recognition that, in many cases, their jobs are no less sales-oriented.  The similarities between the typical broker day and that of an Institutional Salesperson are obvious from previous Interloper post “Sell-Side Optimism”.  Institutional traders, who for outside observers may appear more immune from the less savory techniques of Al Bundy, have their own selling job to do, buttering up institutional traders over steak to cement relationships with the goal of receiving the biggest order tickets. Investment Bankers represent sales skills at the highest, money-is-no-object level. The $5k custom made suits, chartered planes and $2500 per bottle sauternes are part of a package designed to impress CFOs enough to “take the pitch meeting”.

The fresh out of Wharton newbies and Wall Street fanboys cringe at this depiction of finance with sales skills at its center. Drunk on “Den of Thieves”, “Barbarians at the Gate”, Gekko and other bizporn, their romantic notion of finance revolves around innovation and big ideas representing self-evident genius. They imagine split-second decision making with $100s of millions as a weekly occurrence from atop their leather, 58th floor thrones and the thought of making numerous unwelcome, unreturned cold calls never occurs to them.

Like Hollywood, there are the super-talented or super-lucky who do become magazine-cover, grossly wealthy, stars. But also like Hollywood, for every celebrity there are 10s of thousands of hangers-on, begging for single lines of onscreen dialogue with the star before heading for their shift at Starbucks. Despite Melanie Griffith’s experience in Working Girl (“Trask. Radio”), the vast majority of I-banking cake is generated by copying the one good idea generated every five years (CDOs, Leveraged Buyouts, etc) and flogging the shit out of it to any client where it might apply. (I have seen a few cases where this process is made obvious by the spelling mistakes in legal documents from the initial, trend setting deal being literally cut and pasted into new docs, even when it was another company that did the first one.)

The catalyst for this “sales skills are everything” post were the hilarious emails posted HERE, from frustrated wannabe male financiers pushing hard for second dates in spite of the comic failure of the first. For sure they’re exaggerated examples but the brutal, thick skinned, pigheaded sales skills necessary to succeed in finance are clearly on display (as is the obsessive level of detail – “playing with your hair is a clear psychological sign of flirting, so I’m confused….”. No industry rewards OCD like finance). The odds of these completely non-self-aware idiots ever sustaining a relationship that could be considered “adult” by any impartial observer are, or course, negligible. On the other hand, the prospects for their career in the industry are probably bright, particularly if they hang around long enough to learn to soften the rough edges of the pitch. I would even extend this thought to a warning – if the names of the misguided emailers become public, I would be very careful about public ridicule. These dudes are exactly the right personality type to wind up on the cover of Forbes in the next decade.

5 thoughts on “Most Likely to Succeed in Finance: “Unlucky at Love” E-mailers

  1. D says:

    The comments are even more off the wall than the email. Great post as always.

  2. Mario says:

    I love what conclusions and awareness you brought to the finance world based on this email exchange. GREAT post. Probably (definitely) one of your most poetic and prophetic. Love it. Also it helped confirm even further why I refuse to be a broker. ;) CPA all the way baby!!

  3. Lunchtime Links: Deep inside the mind of Bob Diamond – or ... | Job news & advice | eFinancialCareers says:

    [...] The fresh out of Wharton newbies and Wall Street fanboys cringe at this depiction of finance with sales skills at its center. Their romantic notion of finance revolves around innovation and big ideas representing self-evident genius.(Interloping)  [...]

  4. mike says:

    Calls will be returned to brokers who have something original to say or can document returns >15% for existing clients. If all a broker has to offer is the usually loaded mutual fund, of course no one with any brains is going to call back.

  5. Jonas says:

    I like the depiction, but it exposes the dichotomy between the actual practice of finance and the illusion of its value for capitalism in society.

    How does flogging the shit out of 1 good idea every 5 years for any client that it might apply lead to efficient capital allocation? I guess that’s yet another terrific sales job that finance has successfully pulled off over the last X years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 205 other followers

%d bloggers like this: